--- language: - en license: cc-by-nc-nd-4.0 library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-classification tags: - emotion-recognition - bayesian-deep-learning - mc-dropout - uncertainty-quantification - multi-label-classification datasets: - Skylion007/openwebtext - google-research-datasets/go_emotions metrics: - precision - recall - f1 model-index: - name: EmCoder results: - task: type: text-classification name: Multi-label Emotion Classification dataset: name: GoEmotions type: go_emotions split: test metrics: - name: Macro F1 type: f1 value: 0.463 - name: Macro Precision type: precision value: 0.469 - name: Macro Recall type: recall value: 0.486 --- # EmCoder
Probabilistic Emotion Recognition & Uncertainty Quantification
28 Emotion multi-label Transformer classifier
Unlike standard classifiers, EmCoder quantifies what it doesn't know using Monte Carlo Dropout, making it suitable for high-stakes AI pipelines.
EmCoder is optimized for **MC Dropout inference**. ## SOTA benchmark ### Evaluation on the GoEmotions test split (macro avg metrics) EmCoder achieves competitive F1-score with its compact size (~35% smaller than RoBERTa-base and ~45% smaller than ModernBERT), while providing per-class epistemic uncertainty quantification. | Model | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Params | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **EmCoder** | **0.469** | **0.486** | **0.463** | **82.1M** | | Google BERT (Original) | 0.400 | 0.630 | 0.460 | 110M | | RoBERTa-base | 0.575 | 0.396 | 0.450 | 125M | | ModernBERT-base | 0.583 | 0.535 | 0.550 | 149M | ## How to use ### 1. Setup & Tokenization EmCoder uses the `roberta-base` tokenizer for correct token-to-embedding mapping. ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModel, AutoTokenizer repo_id = "yezdata/EmCoder" # Load the same tokenizer used during training tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo_id, trust_remote_code=True) # Initialize with same config as training model = AutoModel.from_pretrained(repo_id, trust_remote_code=True) ``` ### 2. Bayesian inference To obtain probabilistic outputs and uncertainty metrics, use the `mc_forward` method: ```python # Perform 50 stochastic passes N_SAMPLES = 50 MAX_BATCH_SIZE = 10 # optional sub-batching of N_SAMPLES inputs = tokenizer("I am so happy you are here!", return_tensors="pt") model.eval() with torch.no_grad(): # Automatically keeps Dropout active, even when in model.eval mc_logits = model.mc_forward( inputs['input_ids'], inputs['attention_mask'], n_samples=N_SAMPLES, max_batch_size=MAX_BATCH_SIZE ) # Bayesian Post-processing all_probs = torch.sigmoid(mc_logits) # (n_samples, B, 28) mean_probs = all_probs.mean(dim=0) # Mean Predicted Probability uncertainty = all_probs.std(dim=0) # Epistemic Uncertainty # Formatted Output m_probs = mean_probs.squeeze(0) u_vals = uncertainty.squeeze(0) print(f"{'Emotion':<15} | {'Prob':<10} | {'Uncertainty':<10}") print("-" * 40) sorted_indices = torch.argsort(m_probs, descending=True) for idx in sorted_indices: prob, unc = m_probs[idx].item(), u_vals[idx].item() label = model.config.id2label[idx.item()] if prob > 0.05: # Print only emotions with prob > 5% print(f"{label:<15} | {prob:>8.2%} | ±{unc:>8.4f}") ``` ## Model Architecture ![EmCoder Architecture](outputs/architecture.png) ### Optimization The model is trained using a **Weighted Binary Cross Entropy loss** Where weights **w** are calculated using a logarithmic class-balancing scale to handle extreme label imbalance: $$ w_{c} = \max\left( 0.1, \min\left( 20, 1 + \ln \left( \frac{N_{neg,c} + \epsilon}{N_{pos,c} + \epsilon} \right) \right) \right) $$ ## Performance on test set **Using `thresholds.json` optimization of probabilty thresholds for binarizing predictions (from val set)** | | precision | recall | f1-score | support | |:---------------|------------:|---------:|-----------:|----------:| | micro avg | 0.482 | 0.627 | 0.545 | 6329 | | **macro avg** | **0.469** |**0.486** | **0.463** | 6329 | | weighted avg | 0.508 | 0.627 | 0.550 | 6329 | | samples avg | 0.532 | 0.651 | 0.560 | 6329 | |----------------|-------------|----------|------------|-----------| | admiration | 0.613 | 0.607 | 0.610 | 504 | | amusement | 0.724 | 0.886 | 0.797 | 264 | | anger | 0.384 | 0.535 | 0.447 | 198 | | annoyance | 0.230 | 0.431 | 0.300 | 320 | | approval | 0.229 | 0.436 | 0.300 | 351 | | caring | 0.262 | 0.281 | 0.271 | 135 | | confusion | 0.395 | 0.320 | 0.354 | 153 | | curiosity | 0.441 | 0.736 | 0.551 | 284 | | desire | 0.538 | 0.422 | 0.473 | 83 | | disappointment | 0.221 | 0.152 | 0.180 | 151 | | disapproval | 0.242 | 0.536 | 0.333 | 267 | | disgust | 0.595 | 0.407 | 0.483 | 123 | | embarrassment | 0.556 | 0.405 | 0.469 | 37 | | excitement | 0.375 | 0.379 | 0.377 | 103 | | fear | 0.575 | 0.538 | 0.556 | 78 | | gratitude | 0.948 | 0.886 | 0.916 | 352 | | grief | 0.200 | 0.167 | 0.182 | 6 | | joy | 0.566 | 0.559 | 0.562 | 161 | | love | 0.762 | 0.861 | 0.809 | 238 | | nervousness | 0.333 | 0.174 | 0.229 | 23 | | optimism | 0.632 | 0.516 | 0.568 | 186 | | pride | 0.750 | 0.375 | 0.500 | 16 | | realization | 0.250 | 0.159 | 0.194 | 145 | | relief | 0.286 | 0.182 | 0.222 | 11 | | remorse | 0.547 | 0.839 | 0.662 | 56 | | sadness | 0.432 | 0.513 | 0.469 | 156 | | surprise | 0.483 | 0.504 | 0.493 | 141 | | neutral | 0.555 | 0.811 | 0.659 | 1787 | ### Entropy-based uncertainty quantification **Model uncertainty quantification on GoEmotions test set** Flattened emotion predictions | Mean probability vs Epistemic | Mean probability vs Aleatoric | | :---: | :---: | | ![Epistemic Scatter](outputs/epistemic_unc_scatter.png) | ![Aleatoric Scatter](outputs/aleatoric_unc_scatter.png) | **Demonstration of model uncertainty utilization** Compute F1 score while removing the most uncertain (epistemic) x % of positive and negative classified test samples ![F1 Rejection curve](outputs/f1_rejection_epistemic.png) **Emotion uncertainty distribution** | Epistemic | Aleatoric | | :---: | :---: | | ![Epistemic Ridge](outputs/ridge_epistemic.png) | ![Aleatoric Ridge](outputs/ridge_aleatoric.png) | ## Workflow ![EmCoder Workflow](outputs/workflow.png) ### Note Note that this model was trained on GoEmotions dataset (social networks domain) and it may not generalize well to other domains. ## Citation If you use this model, please cite it as follows: ```bibtex @software{jez2026emcoder, author = {Václav Jež}, title = {EmCoder: Probabilistic Emotion Recognition & Uncertainty Quantification}, year = {2026}, publisher = {GitHub}, journal = {GitHub repository}, howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/yezdata/emcoder}}, version = {1.0.0} } ```